Adobe bridge vs acdsee8/2/2023 ![]() ![]() That's a pretty significant thing for video artists and game developers. ![]() The Bridge doesn't tell you if an image has an alpha channel or not. The Maya rendering led me to another problem (they end soon, honestly). The only format advantages I've seen the Bridge have are for the Zip and JPEG-compressed TIFFs which iView is still not able to render. I know it seems harsh to be constantly comparing Adobe's Bridge to the output of the Lemke Software juggernaut, but bear with me. GraphicConverter, on the other hand, can preview and open the IFF file, even without the QuickTime component. Monks: 1, me: 0Īnd I'm not sure why the default app for the IFF format is Illustrator. The image on the left is fine but doesn't render but the one on the right does. I found that you can use the rename dialog in the Bridge as a workaround to get it to copy the files somewhere but that's not an ideal solution. The established image browsers have user-selected quick copy folders or at least a way to get your image into a specified folder. Third, there is no copy or move file dialog. Second, there are no spring-loaded folders (a Mac Finder thing that's been widely adopted where folders pop open when you drag an item onto them). The first is a bug: Window scrolling is nonexistent when you drag towards a window extent so even dragging into a folder in the same window can be impossible. But three things limit its usefulness here. The Bridge is also supposed to be used as a file manager, so it should be at least as good at moving a single file to a nested folder as the OS X Finder (which gets more user scorn than a Trojan condom). You can drag from the thumbnails though, so emailing images is just a matter of a drag and drop to the Dock. I don't expect the Bridge to do much but having to open an image in Photoshop or Acrobat to print a native Adobe format or convert a TIFF to a JPEG seems pretty lame. The Bridge relies too much on the other Adobe apps, so all of the editing/printing things have to be done from their respective programs. It doesn't convert images, e-mail them as attachments, upload them, print them, lock them or many of the other things you would potentially do with images in a day-to-day scenario beyond just browsing them. If you're hoping to use the Bridge to do much beyond browsing, it's not going to impress. Sorry, I don't do printing or uploading, you want that guy over there. The image browser stakes are already high so coming in now means a lot of work to catch up. Now imagine that every month or so over six versions. I counted 41 new and updated features as well as bug fixes for a 0.0.1 update. Just read a single updated features list for GraphicConverter and you'll realize how hard ONE GUY (Thorsten Lemke) is working on GC. In short, there's nothing revolutionary about an image browser.Īdobe is filling a gap while trying to integrate it with its other apps to make for a smoother workflow, which is welcome from the standpoint of working with their products but people have been filling this gap for years. Some offer batch file renaming, finding duplicates based on image similarity, ftp uploading, importing from a digital camera, and OS-specific things like file locking and labeling. While most assume that you're going to do your serious image editing in another app like Photoshop and offer easy ways to take your file there, all offer simple editing/management things like lossless JPEG rotation, format conversion, slideshows and duplicate/move/delete. On the Mac side, the big ones are GraphicConverter, ViewIt and iView MediaPro and on the Windows side, ACDSee and ThumbsPlus are popular (If your favorite isn't here, drop a "Yoyoyoyoyo, shout out to my app ImageCavorter9000!!!" in the discussion thread). Whether you're a photographer, texture artist, or one of the millions of people with a digital camera, you're used to working with a lot of images and probably have a program that does browsing and file management and does it well. If Adobe is offering the Bridge as an integral part of a workflow, it's going to have to unseat the browsing champs. Which leads us to? How it compares to the competition But, as mentioned later on, it?s definitely faster than other similar apps. I had a 1.5 GB folder full of layered 300 dpi spreads and it took a good minute to build previews for all of the PSD and EPS working files in the folder. It takes a while to generate previews for large files. Also, if you don't like that big tile-fest sitting on your screen in the background after you've opened an image into Photoshop, hold option when doubleclicking an image and it will hide in the background.Īs far thumbnail generation goes, it works much like iView: first grabbing the built-in thumbnails and then rebuilding larger ones after. You can control the background color, which I set to match the old default from iView. The preview pane and metadata: handles animated formats like a champ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |